Critically Evaluate the Debates Surrounding the Continuity

3. Critic aloney evaluate the debates meet the continuity of Bretton timberlands universes. Which of these institutions would you exhort to be block upd? Justify your choice. plot of land preparing to rebuild the transnational scotch arranging aft(prenominal) WWII, 730 delegates of the 44 allied nations met in New Hampshire, United States, to form the Bretton Woods agreement. The aim was to set up rules and regulations to steady the global m wizardtary brass and plug the leave office movement of cap goods with a global market.The agreement realized two regulatory institutions, firstly the outside(a) Monetary entrepot (IMF) to come across the veer grazes and bridge temporary imbalances of recompense. Secondly, the internationalist lodge of Reconstruction and knowledge (IBRD), by and by known as the reality jargon, which was founded to finance the reconstruction of post war Europe. In 1947 the Havana Charter proposed a one-third regulatory institutio n, the outside(a) plow disposal (ITO) that transformed into the homo mess arrangement (WTO).This judge pass on critically evaluate the performance of the three Bretton Wood? s institutions, giving recommendations to operating theatreal changes for the IMF and the WTO, and argue to discontinue the WB as it operates reliablely. The IMF was one of the disclose institutions that stabilized the demesne economy after WWII. Its initial goal was to regulate and stabilize exchange rates and assists the reconstruction of the domains international payment system. genius of the several(prenominal)ize objectives of the IMF was to prevent the devaluation cycle.Through joining the IMF in the post War period, countries surrendered their scotch rights, specially on setting its exchange rate, in return they were guarantied exchange stableness, avoidance of competitive exchange depreciation and a vainglorious regime of international repayments (deVries, 1986). Essentially the headm aster conception behind the IMF, was to control the behavior of countries that joined the IMF, spelled out in a code that was administered by an international institution. The 1970s oil crisis was a routine rank for the role that the IMF played.Third world countries were close affected by the oil crisis, since their economies became parasitic on oil and the increasing prices put in large amounts of debt. The IMF agreed to fetch specie, and blush wine to crude prominence, with new functions and greater origins of control over even more underage countries (Peet, 2009). The principal(prenominal) change in the IMFs committal, is the huckster of lending to first world countries, in stage to reconstruct the world payment system using expansionary policies, to lending to third world countries, accompanied by conditionalitys, which restrict countries fiscal and monetary policies.Anne Kruger, managing film chargeor of the IMF, said Much of what we do is actually different from the way the Fund operated in those early eld. It has to be. The world economy has changed beyond recognition. But we still apply those self equivalent(prenominal) loading principles, international financial stability and the prevention of c coats (Kruger 2004) The IMF became subject to pure(a) criticism, one of the primary(prenominal) critics is Joseph Stiglitz. He argued that the IMF has failed its mission to patronize global sparing stability.The important pull down of his argument is that the IMF has diverged its initial mission establish on the assumption that markets did non forever and a day work perfectly, that is, thither were times when interference might be needed to unspoiled a stable global stinting edict (Stiglitz, 2002) Now, he argues, the IMF operates by and large on the untenable ideology that markets should be left field to operate on their own, with no need of intervention. The uppercase Consensus by and large influenced the change in sparin g policies of the IMF. The Consensus was based on Latin Ameri privy countries, were growth was not sustained.The article of faith of the Washington Consensus was that this had happened as a government issue of excessive government intervention in the economy. The Consensus at that placefore recommended policies much(prenominal) as capital market relaxation behavior, fiscal austerity and the privatisation of universal companies. Furthermore, critics say the IMF frequently argues for the analogous frugal policies regardless of the situation. (Pettinger, 2008) The IMF blindly obligate the homogeneous conditionalitys to all its adds. What policies might fetch worked for one country might fudge matters even worse in new(prenominal)s.The Argentinean financial crisis (1999-2002), underlines that the policies imposed by the IMF bear induce a country into a severe recessional. The IMF convinced the Argentinean government to maintain its frigid rate of exchange one peso fo r one U. S. dollar. This made imports artificially gaudy exactly exports too expensive. Consequently, Argentina had a severe carry on deficit. Secondly, in order to maintain the overvalued currency, a country needs large reserve of dollars. The IMF lent $40 billion to support the Argentina peso, enhancing the debt of the country.On tallness the IMF made its loans conditional to a goose egg deficit policy. Argentinas implosion has the IMFs fingerprints all over it. (Weisbrot, 2001) nonetheless the IMF has excessively been the last opportunity for galore(postnominal) an otherwise(prenominal) countries to avoid a default. Most currently, the IMF has devoted Greece a 1. 6 billion euro loan, to wait the Greek economy floating, and stabilize the euro zone. another(prenominal) criticism of the IMF is that decisions made on which countries subscribe the right to borrow money atomic number 18 made by a smattering of nations who wealthy person the main rights.Out of the 24 plank members in the IMF, only 10 ar occupied by ontogeny countries, retentiveness only 26% of the sh bes. America in comparison has nearly 18% of the shargons in the IMF. This inequality in the plank of the IMF shows that decisions argon mainly foc intaked in veritable countries. Stiglitz argues that the IMFs decisions were driven by the collective pull up stakes of the G7. Wealthy, industrialized nations, and the commercial and financial intimacys at heart those countries get the hang the IMF. The IMF was not falsely criticized, as yet the existence of the IMF is still important and inevitable.The current financial crisis has shown that supranational organizations such as the IMF still play a key role in stabilizing countries economies. nevertheless in order for the IMF to prosper in future and efficiently operate in frugalally unquestionable and less genuine countries, several changes bequeath pretend to be call fored. Firstly the board members will feel to spl it up more evenly. It is apprehensible that larger countries with more economic end product kick in slightly more vote motive than smaller ones. as yet genuine countries, holding 74% of balloting world-beater, exclusively shake up decisions.Since the IMF largely gives loans to less genuine countries, they should run through enough members on the board to able to make decisions, on loan agreements. Secondly the IMF has to make detailed analyses of to each one country they borrow too, and based on that give consultancy on economic policies. annals has shown that countries can prosper with different economic policies. While the western economy has largely grown on a liberalized free market, the Asian Tigers exact managed to grow, ignoring the neoliberal economic policies the IMF imposed on them.Therefore the IMF must comment that not every country can develop successfully under the same economic policy. The earth patois is the split second institution founded at the Breton Woods conference. It was semiofficially named the International camber for Reconstruction and growing (IBRD). The initial role was to help in the reconstruction of post-war Europe, hardly mentioning the issues of global penury lessening. Now, still the macrocosm marge operates as a development agency, providing loans to developing countries, in order to reduce privation and join on living standards.In its mission statement the swear says, Our dream is a world without meagerness. The size of the World Bank has overly changed dramatically, starting with 38 members in 1946, to 187 members currently. The World Bank comprises two main institutions, the IBRD and the International Development Agency (IDA). The IBRD bears loans to creditworthy middle-income countries, charging an interest rate of around 1%. It raises money through bond sales in the international capital market.These bonds rent a triple A rating, since they are okay by member states share capital. Th e IDA, on the other handy, foc social occasions on providing long-term, interest-free loans to the worlds 78 poorest countries, 39 of which are in Africa, (World Bank official website, 2011) addressing issues such as primary instruction, grassroots health services clean peeing supply and many others. Resources to fund IDA loans are raised through subscriptions from wealthy members such as United States, Japan and Germany (Hill, 2002)The IBRD financed several successful projects in various areas in the developing world and was able to improve the living conditions and reduce the poverty rate in nigh areas. The IBRD, for example, largely funded the education system in Mexico. The WB funded over 18,000 schools under the Quality Schools schedule in rural areas of the country. Recently the WB has given a 300 million US dollar loan, to further support Mexicos School Education System (Educacion y Cultura, 2012). The IDA has also successfully reduced poverty and improved infrastructu re in round areas of the world.A notable example is the Highway Program in Azerbaijan, which focuses on improving international and domestic road networks for stimulating economic growth (World Bank Official Website, 2011) The bridle-path project reduces travel time by 33%, stimulates occupation and business on the rural area and raised over 20,000 stocks. yet the World Bank has faced around severe criticism as well. nonpareil of the strongest criticisms has been the negative environmental impact of approximately the World Bank projects. For instance, the construction of the Yacyreta dekametre in the 1990s in Argentina, which was largely funded by the World Bank.As a endpoint of the dam, over 40,000 people sire been dis ordaind, and the volume of them were not compensated for their losses (The Whirled Bank Group, 2002). Furthermore, because of the dam construction several children failed to chance on their school. The dam also had negative impacts on biodiversity, an d out-of-pocket to the calm waters, diseases such as malaria and the dengue fever started to spread. Another controversial aspect of the World Bank has been its monarchal governance structure, which is dominated by the main developed nations. These countries choose the leadership and of age(p) management of the World Bank, and so their interests dominate the bank (Cornell University pressure, 2006) Similarly to the IMF, the US holds the close to voting power with 15. 8%, to boot all World Bank presidents restrain come from the US. Japan and China take with only 7% and 6% voting power correspondingly. This large voting power inequality shows how voiceless most of the developing countries are, although nearly all loans affect their economies. The last, and arguably the most important criticism of the World Bank, are the neoliberal policies that World Bank imposed on lending nations.The ideas that were created in the Washington Consensus, including the deregulation and relaxati on behavior of markets, privatization and the downscaling of government, were seen as they key policies to promote development. However, what might gather in worked for the western economies might not be the best solution for developing nations. ordinarily the World Bank imposes structural adjustments to countries to which they lend money. These adjustments include reduced state support, and the liberalization of markets. Studies consecrate shown that these policies have led to escalate poverty and a slowdown in the economy, peculiarly in African nations.Richard Peet claims that the austerity policies attached to the World Bank have declined the per Capita income by 25% in sub-Saharan Africa, and the removal of food and agricultural subsidies caused prizes to rise and created food insecurity (Peet, 2003). The policies have not only exacerbated poverty, but collectible to the imposed decline of health expenditures of governments, human immu inspissationficiency virus and other diseases spread rapidly, causing the life forecast of Africans to drop by fifteen years during the last two decades.In the Millennium Development Goal 6, the World Bank states, to turn up the spread of HIV/AIDS, through prevention, care, treatment, and mitigation services for those affected by HIV/AIDS. Although the WB has been successfully combat AIDS in some African nations, spending over 3,000 million USD in the construction of HIV testing and dogma sites, it has worsened the situation in other areas through imposing neoliberal economic policies on countries. Overall the World Bank is an institution out of time and place (Rich, 1994).The IBRD claims to be a development agency, however the institution is funded through issuing bonds on the capital market, creating a conflict of interest. overdue to the fact that numerous shareholders own the IBRD, they will always have the pressure to create shareholder value, and cannot focus their attention solemnly on poverty reduction. Furthermore, the World Bank has largely overlapping interest with the IMF, especially the IBRD. They both focus on the same core neoliberal policies, and impose these on the countries they lend money to.These policies have largely ended in poverty and economic failure in developing countries. Consequently, the IBRD should be discontinued, and the capital that the IBRD holds could be transferred to the IDA. The IDA could then be reorganised as a subgroup of the IMF. This would not only give the IMF a burst image, but also infuse new ideas into the organisation. The IMF can still give equivalent loans as the IBRD did, since they have the capital and the power to credit those loans. There is no surmise that the IDA is an important institution with the correct core values, ut there is simply no need for two supranational institutions focalization on the same broad goals. On top, over the last decades, there have been increasing inflows of FDI into developing countries and private microfinance, which can boost development and GDP growth. The main role of the IDA should therefore be consultancy, to go out the private loans are used effectively. An change magnitude cooperation with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the UN should check out sustainable poverty reduction. The third supranational institution, originating from the Breton Woods agreement is the World Trade Organization.Initially named the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), it aimed to govern international change over relations, since countries would use tariffs to protect their own economies at the outgo of their neighbours. This was seen as a threat to continue the economy into a further recession hence an institution was needed to advertise the free flow of goods and services. The GATT was transformed into the WTO in 1994, under the Marrakech Agreement. Currently, the WTO has 154 members, and embraces 95% of the global market.Its mission still is, to supervise a nd liberalize international share. It has two main functions, firstly to provide a forum for negotiations and for settling disputes. If there is a dispute the WTO may direct the loosing member to take action to bring its laws, regulations or policies into conformity with the WTO Agreements, however there is no punishment enforced. Secondly, it oversees the implementation, administration and operation of the covered agreements (WTO official website, 2012). The WTO claims that the introduced trading system has produced several benefits. Listed in the 10 benefits of the WTO) The main benefits are, firstly, that free passel generally cuts the hail of living and gives the consumer more choice. The reduced trade barriers through negotiations results in reduced comprise for producers, reducing the price of finished goods and services, lastly resulting in a lower cost of living. The change magnitude global competition also forces producers to cut costs, again resulting in a benefit for the consumer. Secondly, lowering trade barriers adds to in-person income. The WTO claims since the Uruguay Round trade deal betwixt $109 and 510 billion dollars were added to the world income. In Europe, the EU Commission calculates that over 198993 EU incomes incrementd by 1. 11. 5% more than they would have done without the iodine Market. Thirdly, trade stimulates economic growth, which could lead to change magnitude jobs, if countries have the correct adjustment policies. Lastly, the least(prenominal) criticized benefit of the WTO, is that the system is based on the rules rather than power. Meaning that voting power is equal for every member, and decisions are largely made by consensus.Rich and poor countries kindred have an equal right to gainsay each other in the WTOs dispute settlement procedures. Although the WTO claims that free trade is essentially positive for all nations, critics have targeted the 10 benefits of WTO harshly. Richard Peet argues, that the WTO clea rly does not adopt a neutral stance on trade policy. He further says the WTO is stormily against protectionism and just profoundly for trade liberalization (Peet, 2003). The WTO therefore generally favours some interests slice harming others. Furthermore, Peet targets the effect of free trade on workers and unemployment.The fact that the WTO shows no evidence for the increase in employment, stating reliable estimates become impossible, shows that there is little behind this benefit. Quite on the contrary, several workers have lost their job as result of free trade, due to increased competition and the cost reduction of manufacturers. Furthermore, free trade often resulted in developing countries trading more but actually earning less. The reason being, many countries were inefficient to shift their production from primary commodities to manufacturing. The increased competition between developing countries and move commodity prizes meant lower profit margins.Another point of crit icism deals with the TRIPs agreement, which sets down minimum standards for many forms of intellectual property. Critics argue that the TRIPS agreement has a detrimental effect on the advance of medicine in developing countries. The most controversial issue involves the use of drugs to retrieve AIDS. For example, Thailand suspended the patents of drugs treating HIV and heart conditions, to make the medicine affordable for poor patients. The EU and the US protested formally and the US even threatened retaliatory actions. The WTOs operations have also been criticised for being biased towards developed nations.While the EU has largely enforced trade protectionist measures, subsidizing the textile and agricultural industry, developing nations have been forced to open their markets. European and US lobbyism plays a great role in the WTO, and explains why the US and the EU were allowed to use these protectionist measures. In general, the WTO has proved to be an spicyly useful instituti on for freer trade, and in some cases successfully enhanced the growth of nations. However several developing countries have matte the downside of free trade, with some of their economies shrinking due to increased competition combined with higher(prenominal) unemployment rates.Nevertheless, according to Ingo Walter an international trade professor at NYU the world as a whole is certainly materially crack off under free trade than with no trade at all and so is the individual nation (Walter, 2011). The WTO will face several challenges in the future, including trade negotiation between BRIC countries and the EU and US. If export-oriented interests think in countries, including the BRICs, they will push for reciprocatory market openings (Schaffer, 2009) The WTO must ensure negotiations are fair, and to ensure that they cannot allow US and EU multinationals to interfere with the WTOs decision qualification.In conclusion, the critics towards the Bretton Woods institutions have sev eral core similarities. These critics argue that the institutions do not effectively alleviate poverty, they are generally poorly governed and developing countries go forward marginal and without influence in decision-making. Those institutions have profoundly affected the developing world and it is time for a reform of these organizations. This essay has outlined the possibility of a unify World Bank and IMF, in order to pool the capital towards a roughhewn goal.For this merger to succeed the IMF will have to undergo serious restructuring and embrace a goal towards the sustainable development of the world economy. Word Count 3228 References Bretton Woods Project. What are the main concerns and criticism about the World Bank and IMF? getable http//www. brettonwoodsproject. org/item. s hypertext mark-up language? x=320869 (Accessed 15 March. 2012) de Vries,M. G. (1986) The International Monetary Fund 1966-1971. Washington D. C International Monetary Fund Education y Cultura. (201 2, March 14) World Bank lends Mexico 300 million dollars for high school. (Education y Cultura) procurable http//www. ducacionyculturaaz. com/noticias/bm-presta-a-mexico-300-mdd-para-educacion-media/? lang=en (Accessed 20 March. 2012) Goddard. C. R, Conklin. J, Passe-SMmith. T. (1996) Open World International semipolitical Economy. Boulder Lynne Rienner Pub Griesgraber,J. M. Gunter B. G. (1996) The Worlds Monetary System towards stability and Sustainability in the Twenty-first Century. capital of the United Kingdom Pluto Press Hill C. W. L. (2002) International Business Competing in the Global Marketplace 3rd ed. capital of the United Kingdom McGraw-Hill Irwin Irwin,A. I. (1999) Do we need the WTO? Available http//www. cato. org/pubs/ ledger/cj19n3/cj19n3-2. df (Accessed 17 March. 2012) Kruger,A. (June 2004) The IMF at 60 fit for Todays Challenges? Available http//www. imf. org/external/np/speeches/2004/062304. htm (Accessed 17 March. 2012) Legrain,P. (2007) Open World The Truth about Globalisation. Chicago Ivan R. Dee Peet,R. (2007) The Geography of Power the making of global economic policy. Oxford University Press Peet,R. (2003) distasteful Trinity, The IMF, World Bank and WTO 2nd ed. London Zed Books Pettinger,T. (2008, 10 November) Criticism of IMF. Available http//econ. economicshelp. org/2008/11/criticism-of-imf. tml (Accessed 17 March. 2012) Schaffer,G. (2009, February 24) Future of the WTO- slack Ideas and Domestic Politics. Available http//uchicagolaw. typepad. com/faculty/2009/02/future-of-the-wto-liberal-ideas-and-domestic-politics-gregory-shaffer. html (Accessed 20 March. 2012) Sinha,A. (2012) What are the important advantages of let loose Trade ? http//www. preservearticles. com/201012291889/important-advantages-free-trade. html (Accessed 20 March. 2012) Stiglitz,J. (2002) globalization and its Discontents. London Penguin Books Stiglitz,J. (2007) Making Globalization ca-ca The Next Steps to Global Justice.London Penguin Weisbrot,M. (2001, declination 25) Argentinas Crisis, IMFs Fingerprints. (Washington Post) Available http//www. washingtonpost. com/ac2/wp-dyn? pagename=article&node=&contentId=A22623-2001Dec24 (Accessed 20 March. 2012) World Bank Group. (2011) Azerbaijan Highway Program. Available http//web. worldbank. org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/ word of honor/0,,printYisCURLYcontentMDK22739570menuPK64256345pagePK34370piPK34424theSitePK4607,00. html (Accessed 20 March. 2012) WTO. (2012) Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. Available