Arguments of the death penalty Essay

Is remnant the justification of a murder or are we merely subduing ourselves by performing the same heinous bring? This argument had been debated for many decades and although some feel that death is the answer to a murder, there are others that find it completely barbaric. Through a painstaking analysis between Edward Kochs cobblers last and Justice and David Brucks The Death Penalty, I mean Koch had the better argument in claiming that death is the justification of a murder. I feel that if person were to kill some other person, we drive all rights to sentence them to a death penalisation to warrantee such a horrific crime would not happen again.If someone had the courage to take the life of another then he/she should have the courage to face the consequences. Although many believed that the death penalization is barbaric, I believe if it is not done, it would hinder Americas goal in functional toward a country that possesses the least crime rates. In Kochs undertake he compared force outcer with the death penalty. Today we are faced with the cream of letting the cancer spread withmethods that considered barbaricBut to give upwould certainly delay the discovery of an eventual cure. (Koch, paragraph 6) What Koch tried to rent to us is that certain methods of reducing cancer symptoms may be make barbaric but it is because of these methods we will find an eventual cure. This applies to the death penalty as well. Although someone may believe the death penalty is barbaric, they can still support it because if we create a society that does not defend the injustice of murder, incidents of murder will decrease.In Brucks argument he attacked back by stating that the death penalty was applied in a discriminatory manner through a man by the get to of Ernest Knighton. Knighton had killed a gas station owner during a robberywhy was Knighton electrocuted when almost everyone else who committed the same offense was not? Was it because he was blackened? Wa s it because his victim and all 12 members of the jurywere right? (Bruck, paragraph 10) Hes stating the jury was racist to Knighton because he was black and the death penalty does not serve justice.I believe that his isnt so because the appeals for distributively murderer are long and accurate. Our courts are made so that individually case is handled effectively and thoroughly to bring forth justice in the case. Koch stated It is not justice to exclude everyone from the penalty of the  legality if a few are found to be so favored. Justice requires that the law be applied equally to all. (Koch, paragraph 11). It is not a racial matter because the appeals process is long and elaborate for every individual and a person will not be given any less(prenominal) attention due to their race.The death penalty served justice to people who had abused it. It will ensure a safer society because potential murderers would be algophobic to kill because if they did, they would be executed as well. If we do not address to practice this then murder rates would steadily increase. It is also not a racial issue because each case is observed with the rise extent of the law. I believe the death penalty should continue to be instated because it will provide for a quicker progression to a murder-free America.