Ethical Dilemma On Accepting An Offer

PART A The Case flush toilet is a two stratum Graduate Engineering Trainee in an Automobile company in India, on a contract binding him to melt down for 3 more age after the training period. On comp permition of his training, John gets admission for a PG Program in Management in a reputed Institute. Because of the good touch sensation he had created during training program, the Company grants him special bring out with pay for this education. come on CEO personally informs him that his two year education expenses exit to a fault be taken by the company. He also expresses his hopes to have him certify for a long tenure with the system.During the last semester of his program, a Multinational cheek in Automobile business offers John a job in their Indian operations, with 6 months intensive job training in Germany. The fee offered was almost 10 times of what he would be getting in his founder interlocking. . The new(a)-fangled organization would also compensate him for wha tever he should pay to the bow employer for returning his leave pay, education expenses or liquidated remedy as per his original contract. Should John take up the decision of joining the new company?PART B John should not leave his present company. totally economic consumption is a legal bondage, no doubt. But, the kind of employer employee goes beyond that. The employer places full trust on the employee for a conscientious work performance. ( Heathfield, S. M, 13-04-2009) The employee delivers goods to the best of his abilities. What he is not able to do because of his deficiency in skill, association or even attitude is acceptable, but knowingly refuse performance of a known skill, or causing a metric negligence of duty is not pardonable.Legal enforcement always has limitations. Most of the things go by moral bindings in purport. Whether it is a family life or work life the element of trust forms the basic ethics of living. John should not let his present employer down. The present employer had gone out of the way to help John in fulfilling his ambition of completing a PG program in Management. In fact, it is this program opportunity had led the way for the new offer from other company. The present employer had not granted him the franchises with a parental attitude.The CEO had specifically called him, offered him the help and expressed his wish that John returns to the company job with added knowledge for a long tenure. John paying back the salaries he had clear during the special leave period or giving back the expenses which the organization had taken for his education, or for that amour sincerely remitting the liquidated damages as per preferably contract, allow all belittle the basic value of human gratitude and acknowledgement. (Hunsinger, D. v. D. , 1995, p. 65) The present employer whitethorn not be able to sue him for more than what they had expended on John.Their feeling of hurt with this incident, and based on that, their attitude towards employee motivation programs will all shrink, affecting the rising incumbents to the organization. So, John should not leave the concern and reject the Offer given to him by the multinational company, with ten plication compensation figures. PART C John should take up the new offer All employment is a legal arrangement. The employer selects the right dealdidate, pays him a fair compensation and the employee discharges his performance with his utmost faith on his ability.The employee shall not cheat the employer in any of his work related activities. He should be faithful to his employer and work for him with total commitment. He should trust his employer and feel at liberty to ask him to give whatever he thinks right on his part to ask. He should never hesitate to remind him of a privilege or condition that the employer forgets to extend. Likewise, he shall not demand for something which is not cod to him. He can always get things clarified wherever he has doubts about his rights. (Assertive Communication, 13-04-2009)Beyond this relationship, no employer has right to expect an employee to continue in employment for ever. Mostly conflict of interest arises only when one accepts another employment while at working with one organization disturbing his emancipation in working with the original organization. (Faculty Guide, 13-04-2009) Johns opportunity is a very rare occurrence. He can not dream of such(prenominal) an offer in the future. He should take it up. Giving up an opportunity, which will benefit him and his familys prosperity because of increased income will be wrong.,For that matter he might be depriving the benefits to society by not contribute his competence in a wider area of work. Sometimes we confuse moral philosophy with ethics. Morals are stated to be selfish too, elsewhere (BrainMeta. Com, 13-042009) All John is expected to do is to go back to his present employer, beg off the CEO the situation and his wish to go for the more pro sperous job. He should be transparent enough to express his predicament. His taking up the new job is by all means for a large piece of land of compensation.It also gives him the opportunity in another country with more stretch to improve his competence. From what has been his case all along, he is a person golden for knowledge and this offer carries with it a good training program. He can always be grateful to his present employer on many future occasions, without damage to any of his personal or social values. For instance, there may be scope for him to be a contact to the new employer for the present employer to enter into collaboration arrangements or business arrangements.