Plessy vs. Ferguson(1896) Whats to be said later courts deciding what is right from wrong, and putt the ruinous in jail, its what courts are there to do, right. Well in the lesson of Plessy vs. Ferguson in 1892,, the Supreme hook was involved because of Plessy taking what he thought was wrong and violating the thirteenth and 14th amendment: The 13th amendment illegalise slavery, and the 14th amendment required that the government treat people equally. after he purchased a ticket on the East lah Railway, New Orleans to Covington, he considered himself white, and only 1/ ordinal faint. He was required to sit in the colored section, and when he refused to move he was jailed. He thought that he should be treated as any other white man. later on Plessy argued in the detach gondola Act that there had been a violation of the 2 amendments listed above , John Howard Ferguson, the judge embrace the case, said that the previous court decision had decided that the know apart Car Act was unconstitutional and that it applied to trains running outside of Louisiana. But , however in this case he concur that the law was constitutional for trains running within the state. later his communicating channel Ferguson found Plessy guilty for not leaving the white-only car.
After Plessy taking his cause to Louisiana State Supreme Court, a higher court, most Fergusons decision, the court decided that what Ferguson said around the Separate Car Act being constitutional was right, and they agreed. afterwards than Plessy took his case, Plessy vs. Ferguson to the Supreme Court of the United States, the high est in the country, and argued his rights as! a white man, and black man. This case ties into the Black codes and both the 13th and 14th amendments because of the inequality... If you compliments to get a full essay, send it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment